• About

Traditional Catholics Emerge

~ Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus

Traditional Catholics Emerge

Tag Archives: post-conciliar Catholicism

50th Anniversary Of The Encyclical Against Contraception & The Vatican Attack Against Itself -Trad Catholic- Journals Round Up – Part #1

25 Wednesday Jul 2018

Posted by telmab7 in Abortion, Infanticide and Contraception, Books and Other Resources, Education, General-Traditional Catholics, News-Catholic Church, Vatican and Clergy

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

50th Anniversary Of Humane Vitae, Catholic Academic Decent From Church Teaching, Catholic Liberalism, Catholic Modernism, Catholic Progressivism, Catholic Reforms of Contraception Teachings, Doctors Robert and Maike Hickson, How Contraception Causes Corruption, How Contraception Overlaps and Snowballs Into Other Heresies, Malthusianism, post-conciliar Catholicism, Prof. Roberto De Mattei, Revolution Within The Catholic Church, Roman Catholic Teachings On Contraception, Sacrament Of Marriage, Scriptures Against Contraception, The Feast Of Saint James, The Order Of The Ends Of Marriage, The Society For The Defense Of Tradition Family And Property, Vatican II, Wijngaards Statement, “The Family Under Attack” Don Pietro Leone

The Feast of Saint James July 25th 2018 – Today is the 50th Anniversary Of Humane Vitae –Presented Herein Is Part #1

A Round Up On The Traditional Teachings Of The Roman Catholic Church On Contraception And Marriage  vs. Conciliar Catholicism – as the Vatican begins to self destructively attack itself

____________________________________________

Brought to light in Professor Roberto De Mattei’s 2010 book – “ The 2nd Vatican Council – An Unwritten Story’ in my pdf linked excerpt from his book is discussed and summarized in the following

  1. The relationship of all this to evolution how the unproven theory of biological evolution becomes for the neo-Catholic world applied to ‘doctrinal evolution’ and the theories of Tiehard de Chardin
  2. A new version of the Christian family that goes beyond the traditional Catholic teachings on marriage found in the established doctrine of Arcanum (Leo XIII) and Casti Connubii (Pius IX) and The Teaching Of The Church To Married Couples by Pius XII from 1939 to 1943 ( a treasure of Catholic doctrine )
  3. A reordering of the ends of matrimony in direct contrast to these eternal magisterium’s teachings over centuries to create a new version of marriage whereby in the new Catholicism the unitive /conjugal love becomes equal (after tombs of pseudo- quasi-philosophy-new-speak) to that of the primary nature of marriage (the latin word for motherhood) ordered to ‘procreation’ and in the post-conciliar era to the unitive /conjugal element’s elevation above all else.
  4. The attempted new definition of the ‘ends of marriage’ was then hammered in by various Council Fathers on a new concept of morality by egalitarianism and democracy was partially expounded by the Patriarch Maximos IV Saigh also speaking to the at Vatican II
  • Does not this state of mind of today’s society perhaps demand a revision of the presentation of the teaching or morality.? The current teaching is excessively marked by the legalism of a bygone era and thoroughly imbued with Roman law. Now our Christian morality must have a Christocentric character with an expression of love and freedom. It must educate each individual to a sense of personal and communal responsibility. Consequently, it is imperative to have a profound revision of our disciplines – which the good old days, accepted by our simple , pious grandfathers, are no longer so today. Let us mention for example the treatment given in our catechisms to the Commandments of the Church. According to our catechisms, skipping Sunday Mass once without a reason , or failing to fast once on Friday, is a mortal sin that consequently merits eternal damnation. Is that reasonable ? Nowadays, how many adult Catholics believe it?
  • This Patriarch’s comments within the context of Vatican II and the evolving Church were published to the whole world and it is estimated that it converted millions of otherwise pious people overnight into semi-practicing Catholics (who by majority eventually fell into dissolution in their faith and questionable state of salvation)
  1. The Traditional Catholic Fathers at Vatican II were reduced to a minority by Papal Order before the start of the 2nd of Sessions of the Council – Coetus International Patrum – Acb Lefebvre, Cardinal Ottaviani , Cardinal Browne, and others protested with an official intervention against changing the teachings of the Catholic Church and their crystal clear teachings on the unchangeable nature of marriage and the Church’s teachings on marriage are also found in direct quotes in the excerpt of Prof De Mattei in the pdf link below ->
  2. The liberal majority then followed by various testimonies involving the exegesis of the prosperity Gospel and protestant concepts of sin, brought it to a ferver and eventually an official dissent from Humane Vitae by the Bishops of Canada and an even larger un-official dissent in the US – whereby Bishops mixed silence with dissent by supporting the wealth of dissident pro-contraception and pro-abortion theologians that then began to multiply like rabbits and corrupt the Catholic education system         _________________________________________          PDF on the link ->Vatican II _3rd Session Chapter_ Contraception & Marriage Prof. R. de Mattei

Remember

Sacred Tradition and Sacred Scripture wedded together and inseparable without damage make up the full deposit of ‘The Word of God’

Christ our Savior and the Mystical Body of Christ are one and the same and are unchangeable Sacred Tradition

 ‘ Jesus Christ is the same , yesterday , today and forever ‘ Hebrews 13:8 – Sacred Scripture

____________________________________

Liberalism is the changing nature of the new-Catholicism , that goes by other terms such as neo-modernism and progressivism

Fr. Henri Ramière: Liberalism is the Enemy of the Social Reign of Christ

https://www.traditioninaction.org/bestof/bst010-Ramiere.htm

________________________________

Even Benedict XVI – not above reproach became involved in the new wave of tipping hats to quasi- philosophy and quasi science

To participants in the International Conference promoted by the Pontifical
Lateran University on the 40th anniversary of the Encyclical Humanae Vitae
(May 10, 2008) | BENEDICT XVI

And here we have at the heart of some of the nonsense

In the Pastoral Constitution on the Church in the Modern World, Gaudium et
Spes, the Second Vatican Council was already addressing scientists, urging
them to join forces to achieve unity in knowledge and a consolidated
certainty on the conditions that can favour “the proper regulation of
births” (n. 52).

. In fact, conjugal love is described within a global process that does not
stop at the division between soul and body and is not subjected to mere
sentiment, often transient and precarious, but rather takes charge of the
person’s unity and the total sharing of the spouses who, in their reciprocal
acceptance, offer themselves in a promise of faithful and exclusive love
that flows from a genuine choice of freedom.

http://w2.vatican.va/content/benedict-xvi/en/speeches/2008/may/documents/hf_
ben-xvi_spe_20080510_humanae-vitae.html

The Vatican II Scientists to which Benedict XVI is referring to in this official 2008 Vatican document are Malthusian

Malthusianism – Wikipedia  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malthusianism which originated from the late 1700sAD teachings of the protestant philosopher and pseudo-scientist Reverend Thomas Robert Malthus. His teachings on over population morphed into the false teachings population bomb book circulated at Vatican II and neo-Malthusianism latter became the basis of the philosophies of socialism and it is here the whole thing dovetails and overlaps into the ecumenical sympathies towards Communism that arose at Vatican II

_________________________________________________

Extensive Book Review: Don Pietro Leone’s “The Family Under Attack” The Most Insightful Write-up of Don Pietro Leone by Drs. Robert & Maike Hickson Summarizing For Us The Best Of The Best Catholic Teachings On This Subject

Allowing Doctrinal and Moral Questions:Don Pietro Leone’s Searching Book on the Family and the Evasion or Inversion of the Finalities  – On Rorate

https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2014/12/extensive-book-review-don-pietro-leones.html

Humanae Vitae: The Encyclical that Condemned the Sexual Revolution Turns
Fifty Today The Feast Of Saint James & The Vigil Of The Matriarch Of The
Holy Family Saint Anne- TFP.org

http://www.tfp.org/humanae-vitae-the-encyclical-that-condemned-the-sexual-revolution/?utm_source=ActiveCampaign&utm_medium=email&utm_content=Papal+Encyclical+condemns+Sexual+Revolution&utm_campaign=TFP180724+-+Papal+Encyclical+condemns+Sexual+Revolution

One Of The Many Teachings Of The Neo- Catholic Church And Their Revolution To Overturn Bans On Contraception Can Be Found Here

Statement on Contraceptives – Wijngaards Institute for Catholic Research

http://www.wijngaardsinstitute.com/statement-on-contraceptives/

The War Against Marriage Continues Here

Vatican archbishop: It’s ‘very dangerous’ to speak of the family as a ‘little church’ | News | LifeSite

Archbishop’s words at variance with Catechism, And Other Official Catholic documents

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/vatican-archbishop-its-very-dangerous-to-speak-of-the-family-as-a-little-ch

Here

The USCCB Continues Its Funding Of Catholic Relief Services – CRS is a Major Funder of Contraception-Lobbyists – On The Lepanto Institute

http://www.lepantoinstitute.org/catholic-relief-services/catholic-relief-services-major-funder-contraception-lobbyists/

And Here

The Maddi Runkles Story The Remnant Newspaper TV In The Undergreound Via  – YouTube

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vtVxX1oOvio

Humanae Vitae was courageous, but not prophetic: Catholic historian | News |
Lifesitenews

One Of Professor De Mattei’s Not So Hard Hitting As -Usual Moments

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/humanae-vitae-was-courageous-but-not-proph
etic-catholic-historian

The Revolution Is Based On Contraception And The Vatican II Redefinition Of Marriage – In The News Round Up Of The Pro-Life Sensus Fidelium | TCE

https://traditionalcatholicsemerge.com/2018/05/17/the-revolution-is-based-on-contraception-and-the-vatican-ii-redefinition-of-marriage-in-the-news-round-up-of-the-pro-life-sensus-fidelium/


Contraception has caused damaging ‘mutation’ in our social relations: noted
theologian | News | LifeSite

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/contraception-has-caused-damaging-mutation
-in-our-social-relations-noted-th

 

Humanae Vitae’s Challenge to Modernity – Crisis Magazine

https://www.crisismagazine.com/2018/humanae-vitaes-challenge-modernity

Humanae Vitae: Blessed Paul VI’s Miracle – Crisis Magazine

https://www.crisismagazine.com/2018/humanae-vitae-blessed-paul-vis-miracle

March 2018

Vatican Begins Mounting Its Attack Against Celibacy And Contraception | TCE

https://traditionalcatholicsemerge.com/2018/03/12/vatican-begins-mounting-its-attack-against-celibacy-and-contraception/

What the Traditional Roman Catholic Church Teaches On Contraception In Sacred Scripture And Tradition

Scripture

Gen 1:28, 9:1,7; 35:11 – from the beginning, the Lord commands us to be fruitful (“fertile”) and multiply. A husband and wife fulfill God’s plan for marriage in the bringing forth of new life, for God is life itself.

Gen. 28:3 – Isaac’s prayer over Jacob shows that fertility and procreation are considered blessings from God.

Gen. 38:8-10 – Onan is killed by God for practicing contraception (in this case, withdrawal) and spilling his semen on the ground.

Gen. 38:11-26 – Judah, like Onan, also rejected God’s command to keep up the family lineage, but he was not killed.

Deut. 25:7-10 – the penalty for refusing to keep up a family lineage is not death, like Onan received. Onan was killed for wasting seed.

Gen. 38:9 – also, the author’s usage of the graphic word “seed,” which is very uncharacteristic for Hebrew writing, further highlights the reason for Onan’s death.

Exodus 23:25-26; Deut. 7:13-14 – God promises blessings which include no miscarriages or barrenness. Children are blessings from God, and married couples must always be open to God’s plan for new life with every act of marital intimacy.

Lev.18:22-23;20:13 – wasting seed with non-generative sexual acts warrants death. Many Protestant churches, which have all strayed from the Catholic Church, reject this fundamental truth (few Protestants and Catholics realize that contraception was condemned by all of Christianity – and other religions – until the Anglican church permitted it in certain cases at the Lambeth conference in 1930. This opened the floodgates of error).

Lev. 21:17,20 – crushed testicles are called a defect and a blemish before God. God reveals that deliberate sterilization and any other methods which prevent conception are intrinsically evil.

Deut. 23:1 – whoever has crushed testicles or is castrated cannot enter the assembly. Contraception is objectively sinful and contrary, not only to God’s Revelation, but the moral and natural law.

Deut. 25:11-12 – there is punishment for potential damage to the testicles, for such damage puts new life at risk. It, of course, follows that vasectomies, which are done with willful consent, are gravely contrary to the natural law.

1 Chron. 25:5 – God exalts His people by blessing them with many children. When married couples contracept, they are declaring “not your will God, but my will be done.”

Psalm 127:3-5 – children are a gift of favor from God and blessed is a full quiver. Married couples must always be open to God’s precious gift of life. Contraception, which shows a disregard for human life, has lead to the great evils of abortion, euthanasia, and infanticide.

Hosea 9:11; Jer. 18:21 – God punishes Israel by preventing pregnancy. Contraception is a curse, and married couples who use contraception are putting themselves under the same curse.

Mal. 2:14 – marriage is not a contract (which is a mere exchange of property or services). It is a covenant, which means a supernatural exchange of persons. Just as God is three in one, so are a husband and wife, who become one flesh and bring forth new life, three in one. Marital love is a reflection of the Blessed Trinity.

Mal. 2:15 – What does God desire? Godly offspring. What is contraception? A deliberate act against God’s will. With contraception, a couple declares, “God may want an eternal being created with our union, but we say no.” Contraception is a grave act of selfishness.

Matt. 19:5-6 – Jesus said a husband and wife shall become one. They are no longer two, but one, just as God is three persons, yet one. The expression of authentic marital love reintegrates our bodies and souls to God, and restores us to our original virginal state (perfect integration of body and soul) before God.

Matt. 19:6; Eph. 5:31 – contraception prevents God’s ability to “join” together. Just as Christ’s love for the Church is selfless and sacrificial, and a husband and wife reflect this union, so a husband and wife’s love for each other must also be selfless and sacrificial. This means being open to new life.

Acts 5:1-11 – Ananias and Sapphira were slain because they withheld part of a gift. Fertility is a gift from God and cannot be withheld.

Rom.1:26-27 – sexual acts without the possibility of procreation is sinful. Self-giving love is life-giving love, or the love is a lie. The unitive and procreative elements of marital love can never be divided, or the marital love is also divided, and God is left out of the marriage.

1 Cor. 6:19-20 – the body is the temple of the Holy Spirit; thus, we must glorify God in our bodies by being open to His will.

1 Cor. 7:5 – this verse supports the practice of natural family planning (“NFP”). Married couples should not refuse each other except perhaps by agreement for a season, naturally.

Gal. 6:7-8 – God is not mocked for what a man sows. If to the flesh, corruption. If to the Spirit, eternal life.

Eph. 5:25 – Paul instructs husbands to love their wives as Christ loved the Church, by giving his entire body to her and holding nothing back. With contraception, husbands tell their wives, I love you except your fertility, and you can have me except for my fertility. This love is a lie because it is self-centered, and not self-giving and life-giving.

Eph. 5:29-31; Phil. 3:2 – mutilating the flesh (e.g., surgery to prevent conception) is gravely sinful. Many Protestant churches reject this most basic moral truth.

1 Tim. 2:15 – childbearing is considered a “work” through which women may be saved by God’s grace.

Deut. 22:13-21 – these verses also show that God condemns pre-marital intercourse. The living expression of God’s creative love is reserved for a sacramental marriage between one man and one woman.

Rev. 9:21; 21:8; 22:15; Gal. 5:20 – these verses mention the word “sorcery.” The Greek word is “pharmakeia” which includes abortifacient potions such as birth control pills. These pharmakeia are mortally sinful. Moreover, chemical contraception does not necessarily prevent conception, but may actually kill the child in the womb after conception has occurred (by preventing the baby from attaching to the uterine wall). Contraception is a lie that has deceived millions, but the Church is holding her arms open wide to welcome back her children who have strayed from the truth.

Tradition / Church Fathers

“Moreover, he [Moses] has rightly detested the weasel [Lev. 11:29]. For he means, ‘Thou shall not be like to those whom we hear of as committing wickedness with the mouth with the body through uncleanness [orally consummated sex]; nor shall thou be joined to those impure women who commit iniquity with the mouth with the body through uncleanness’” Letter of Barnabas 10:8 (A.D. 74).

“Because of its divine institution for the propagation of man, the seed is not to be vainly ejaculated, nor is it to be damaged, nor is it to be wasted” Clement of Alexandria, The Instructor of Children 2:10:91:2 (A.D. 191).

“To have coitus other than to procreate children is to do injury to nature.” Clement of Alexandria, The Instructor of Children 2:10:95:3 (A.D. 191).

“[Christian women with male concubines], on account of their prominent ancestry and great property, the so-called faithful want no children from slaves or lowborn commoners, [so] they use drugs of sterility or bind themselves tightly in order to expel a fetus which has already been engendered.” Hippolytus, Refutation of All Heresies 9:12 (A.D. 225).

“[Some] complain of the scantiness of their means, and allege that they have not enough for bringing up more children, as though, in truth, their means were in [their] power . . . or God did not daily make the rich poor and the poor rich. Wherefore, if any one on any account of poverty shall be unable to bring up children, it is better to abstain from relations with his wife.” Lactantius, Divine Institutes 6:20 (A.D. 307).

“God gave us eyes not to see and desire pleasure, but to see acts to be performed for the needs of life; so too, the genital [’generating’] part of the body, as the name itself teaches, has been received by us for no other purpose than the generation of offspring.” Lactantius, Divine 6:23:18 (A.D. 307).

“[I]f anyone in sound health has castrated himself, it behooves that such a one, if enrolled among the clergy, should cease [from his ministry], and that from henceforth no such person should be promoted. But, as it is evident that this is said of those who willfully do the thing and presume to castrate themselves, so if any have been made eunuchs by barbarians, or by their masters, and should otherwise be found worthy, such men this canon admits to the clergy.” Council of Nicaea I, Canon 1 (A.D. 325).

“They [certain Egyptian heretics] exercise genital acts, yet prevent the conceiving of children. Not in order to produce offspring, but to satisfy lust, are they eager for corruption.” Epiphanius of Salamis, Medicine Chest Against Heresies 26:5:2 (A.D. 375).

“This proves that you [Manicheans] approve of having a wife, not for the procreation of children, but for the gratification of passion. In marriage, as the marriage law declares, the man and woman come together for the procreation of children. Therefore, whoever makes the procreation of children a greater sin than copulation, forbids marriage and makes the woman not a wife but a mistress, who for some gifts presented to her is joined to the man to gratify his passion.” Augustine, The Morals of the Manichees 18:65 (A.D. 388).

“Why do you sow where the field is eager to destroy the fruit, where there are medicines of sterility [oral contraceptives], where there is murder before birth? You do not even let a harlot remain only a harlot, but you make her a murderess as well…Indeed, it is something worse than murder, and I do not know what to call it; for she does not kill what is formed but prevents its formation. What then? Do you condemn the gift of God and fight with his [natural] laws?…Yet such turpitude…the matter still seems indifferent to many men—even to many men having wives. In this indifference of the married men there is greater evil filth; for then poisons are prepared, not against the womb of a prostitute, but against your injured wife. Against her are these innumerable tricks.” John Chrysostom, Homilies on Romans 24 (A.D. 391).

“[I]n truth, all men know that they who are under the power of this disease [the sin of covetousness] are wearied even of their father’s old age [wishing him to die so they can inherit]; and that which is sweet, and universally desirable, the having of children, they esteem grievous and unwelcome. Many at least with this view have even paid money to be childless, and have mutilated nature, not only killing the newborn, but even acting to prevent their beginning to live.” John Chrysostom, Homilies on Matthew 28:5 (A.D. 391).

“[T]he man who has mutilated himself, in fact, is subject even to a curse, as Paul says, ‘I would that they who trouble you would cut the whole thing off’ [Gal. 5:12]. And very reasonably, for such a person is venturing on the deeds of murderers, and giving occasion to them that slander God’s creation, and opens the mouths of the Manicheans, and is guilty of the same unlawful acts as they that mutilate themselves among the Greeks. For to cut off our members has been from the beginning a work of demonical agency, and satanic device, that they may bring up a bad report upon the works of God, that they may mar this living creature, that imputing all not to the choice, but to the nature of our members, the more part of them may sin in security as being irresponsible, and doubly harm this living creature, both by mutilating the members and by impeding the forwardness of the free choice in behalf of good deeds.” John Chrysostom, Homilies on Matthew 62:3 (A.D. 391).

“But I wonder why he [the heretic Jovinianus] set Judah and Tamar before us for an example, unless perchance even harlots give him pleasure; or Onan, who was slain because he grudged his brother seed. Does he imagine that we approve of any sexual intercourse except for the procreation of children?” Jerome, Against Jovinian 1:19 (A.D. 393).

“Observe how bitterly he [Paul] speaks against their deceivers…‘I would that they which trouble you would cut the whole thing off’ [Gal. 5:12]…On this account he curses them, and his meaning is as follows: ‘For them I have no concern, “A man that is heretical after the first and second admonition refuse” [Titus 3:10]. If they will, let them not only be circumcised but mutilated.’ Where then are those who dare to mutilate themselves, seeing that they draw down the apostolic curse, and accuse the workmanship of God, and take part with the Manichees?” John Chrysostom, Commentary on Galatians 5:12 (A.D. 395).

“You may see a number of women who are widows before they are wives. Others, indeed, will drink sterility and murder a man not yet born, [and some commit abortion].” Jerome, Letters 22:13 (A.D. 396).

“You [Manicheans] make your auditors adulterers of their wives when they take care lest the women with whom they copulate conceive. They take wives according to the laws of matrimony by tablets announcing that the marriage is contracted to procreate children; and then, fearing because of your law [against childbearing]…they copulate in a shameful union only to satisfy lust for their wives. They are unwilling to have children, on whose account alone marriages are made. How is it, then, that you are not those prohibiting marriage, as the apostle predicted of you so long ago [1 Tim. 4:1–4], when you try to take from marriage what marriage is? When this is taken away, husbands are shameful lovers, wives are harlots, bridal chambers are brothels, fathers-in-law are pimps.” Augustine, Against Faustus 15:7 (A.D. 400).

“For thus the eternal law, that is, the will of God creator of all creatures, taking counsel for the conservation of natural order, not to serve lust, but to see to the preservation of the race, permits the delight of mortal flesh to be released from the control of reason in copulation only to propagate progeny.” Augustine, Against Faustus 22:30 (A.D. 400).

“For necessary sexual intercourse for begetting [children] is alone worthy of marriage. But that which goes beyond this necessity no longer follows reason but lust. And yet it pertains to the character of marriage…to yield it to the partner lest by fornication the other sin damnably [through adultery]…[T]hey [must] not turn away from them the mercy of God…by changing the natural use into that which is against nature, which is more damnable when it is done in the case of husband or wife. For, whereas that natural use, when it pass beyond the compact of marriage, that is, beyond the necessity of begetting [children], is pardonable in the case of a wife, damnable in the case of a harlot; that which is against nature is execrable when done in the case of a harlot, but more execrable in the case of a wife. Of so great power is the ordinance of the Creator, and the order of creation, that . . . when the man shall wish to use a body part of the wife not allowed for this purpose [orally or anally consummated sex], the wife is more shameful, if she suffer it to take place in her own case, than if in the case of another woman.” Augustine, The Good of Marriage 11–12 (A.D. 401).

“I am supposing, then, although you are not lying [with your wife] for the sake of procreating offspring, you are not for the sake of lust obstructing their procreation by an evil prayer or an evil deed. Those who do this, although they are called husband and wife, are not; nor do they retain any reality of marriage, but with a respectable name cover a shame. Sometimes this lustful cruelty, or cruel lust, comes to this, that they even procure poisons of sterility…Assuredly if both husband and wife are like this, they are not married, and if they were like this from the beginning they come together not joined in matrimony but in seduction. If both are not like this, I dare to say that either the wife is in a fashion the harlot of her husband or he is an adulterer with his own wife.” Augustine, Marriage and Concupiscence 1:15:17 (A.D. 419).

“Who is he who cannot warn that no woman may take a potion so that she is unable to conceive or condemns in herself the nature which God willed to be fecund? As often as she could have conceived or given birth, of that many homicides she will be held guilty, and, unless she undergoes suitable penance, she will be damned by eternal death in hell. If a woman does not wish to have children, let her enter into a religious agreement with her husband; for chastity is the sole sterility of a Christian woman.” Caesarius of Arles, Sermons 1:12 (A.D. 522).

CONTRACEPTION – Scripture Catholic

https://www.scripturecatholic.com/contraception/

St. James the Greater, Saint of July 25 By Prof. Plinio Corrêa de Oliveira – On TIA

https://www.traditioninaction.org/SOD/j222sd_JamesGreater_07_25.html

St. James was executed by sword in Jerusalem, the first Apostle martyred

 

 

False Ecumenism – Pope Francis Becomes The Incarnation Of Vatican II

18 Friday May 2018

Posted by telmab7 in Books and Other Resources, Education, General-Traditional Catholics, Islam, Jehova's Witness, Protestanism, Religions (Other)

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Christ reign as King in face of ‘apostasy’, combating heresy inside Church, Concepts of Christendom, Ecumenism, Exsurge Domine, Heresies, Intercommunion With Protestants, Lutheranism Inside the Post Conciliar Catholic Church, Pope Leo X, post-conciliar Catholicism, Syllabus of Errors, treatise On the Trinity by Saint Hilary. Pope Francis

While many insightfully point to the era between Pius IX , Pius X, and Pius XI as the beginning of the era of the fight against  modernism within the Church and the modernism of the post conciliar era in the ‘supposed spirit of Vatican II as its resurgence, that is not necessarily a complete objective scenario

Firstly, it never completely subsided following the era of the Popes of the Pius titles and secondly it was not the spirit of the Council post-haste but clearly came out of a school of thought and into a political party at the Council – It was in the counter preparatory works of the Council – all the debates at the Council and with the Council documents itself, that any student of the Council will clearly see in volumes of empirical evidence.

The  false paradigm of ecumenism is something that was invented at Vatican II – even the invention Secretariat For Non-Christian religions was a ground breaking challenge to Roman Catholic doctrine

In order to declare this new catholic dogma of ecumenism, they first needed to suppress the Catholic philosophy of Thomas Aquinas and Aristotle, including natural law, and to especially to overturn the natural principals of non-contradiction. The ground work became the elevation of the ‘human’ in human dignity and the elevation of the rights of religious liberty (of any religion) In order to accomplish this new declaration a new philosophy need be introduced which was quickly revealed as the ‘reason’ or need for a Council if they were somehow to upstage an infallible Catholic teaching that the Rights of God including the Rights of God in his one true Church , the mystical body of Christ, would be in need of more than suppression but redefinition. Hence the center of the council became the encyclicals on religious liberty and the elevation of the dignity of the human person.

We are now seeing the bad fruits of the anti- Catholic neo-Catholic  non-binding Catholic social teaching of ecumenism with ALL religions , the formal heresy of ‘syncretism’ that Freemasonry sought all  along especially in its liaison emissaries to the Council.

At the Council there was a conservative group Coetus Internationalis to which many interventions were made by the likes of Archbishops Ruffini, Lefebvre, Cardinal Ottovani and many others. Among them, one such intervention was to protest the book being heavily circulated at the Council by the liaison to freemasonry Baron de Masuadon on the new ‘human fraternity’ required by all religions The book , popular among high level Catholic prelates, was “Ecumenism As Seen By A Traditional Freemason”  What followed from a lower level Father Giovani Capril attempted to form another reproachment of freemasonry as well,with the re-listing of the 200+ official Catholic Church works and statements against freemasonry as antithetical to all of Christianity and its philosophies , including that of ecumenism as an ‘enemy “ of Catholicism – see R. de Mattei – Vatican II- The untold Story 3rd session of the council.

False religions from the time of the Council on would then proliferate like no other era in salvation history. Islam would see its greatest increase and spread in its own history as it was officially no longer resisted by Catholicism but suddenly and strangely recognized as one of the worlds great religions , contrary to everything that Roman Catholicism had ever previously said or declared about islamic mohammedanism. Similar treatises were begun on the eastern mystery religions including buddhism in that there were suddenly some general good and truth within these religions without ever specifically stating what that good might be aside from their mutual denial of the divinity of Christ in the heresy of Arianism that in one era almost destroyed the Church in the 4th century

Yesterday Pope Francis publicly stated that his hope was that Catholics would grow closer to the tenets of Buddhism  Pope Francis: My Wish Is for Buddhists and Catholics to Grow ‘Increasingly
Closer’
http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2018/05/16/pope-francis-my-wish-is-that-buddhists-and-catholics-will-grow-increasingly-closer/ Jesus Christ, Our Shepherd: Apostasy: Bergoglio respects the false gods of Buddhism http://4christum.blogspot.com/2018/05/apostate-bergoglio-wants-people-to.html

So we have high level prelates left and right as our Lady of Fatima predicted (minus the consecration) would happen and that they would begin to oppose one another within the Catholic Church  Cardinal raises question: Is Pope Francis part of Church’s ‘final trial’? | News | LifeSite https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/cardinal-raises-question-is-pope-francis-part-of-churchs-final-trial

So now it becomes the era of the mission of the lay Catholics to carry the torch and stand in the gap for the survivability of the remnant of sacred tradition , family, and property – God’s covenantal people are being called upon into action – There is no one else behind us – Many do not realize that it is now us or no one

We were not promised the Church would last until the end of time “in it’s present size and form” only that there would be a Church (most likely underground as in the early Church while all else in orthodoxy is persecuted )

Interview: Bishop Schneider Addresses a New “Syllabus of Errors” for the
Modern Church – OnePeterFive

https://onepeterfive.com/interview-bishop-schneider-addresses-a-new-syllabus
-of-errors-for-the-modern-church/

Bishop Schneider: Catholics are called to combat heresy inside Church | News | LifeSite

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/bishop-schneider-catholics-are-called-to-be-soldiers-against-evil

It’s logical conclusion is simply if their are truths within non Christian religions that no longer calls us to help convert these peoples then Christians that are not Catholic must somehow believe the same things we believe. All we need to do in suppress every doctrinal and dogmatic difference between these Christian religions , declare the philosophy of non-contradiction and anyone who espouses it and or traditional Catholicism as an unmerciful peoples in need of sanctions and suppression for their own good.

Therefore we have Cardinals and Bishops declaring that  if this is truly the new teachings of the Church and we follow the Vatican declared non-binding non-doctrinal pastoral teachings and documents of the Council we cannot deny intercommunion to adulterers and protestants. The dignity of the person, the rights of the human person and his own discernment in his or her own personal interpretation must be higher than the law. This is what the council taught in several dozen places and the post conciliar prelates pounded into the religious and the laity in the era that followed the Council.

Possibly everyone is being too critical of Pope Francis and perhaps he and the other progressive modernists that are now  in the majority of the leadership of the Church are merely bringing into the open air and attempting to implement what was only previously suggested and implied by the new religious teaching of the Council & its official encyclicals.  The Pope’s defense, that we’ve yet to hear raised, is.. ‘but its right here in the Council documents.’

Pope John Paul II declared Saint of the Church tried to find an invisible middle road between the Council and Catholic tradition – as illustrated in his creation and issuance of Ecclesia Dei (1988) – Pope Benedict XVI upon reaching the See of Peter became much more traditional and ignored much of the previous teachings of the Council. Pope Francis has said, on multiple occasions in truth, that the Council has not been (as of yet ) fully implemented.

It is also most clearly present in the Council’s imposed overthrow of the aristocratic ecclesial structure of the Church and it’s re-org to a democratic government model open to interpretation by regional vote, in a continuing decades long re-organization. The more we read and study the more we come to understand, it’s not Pope Francis it’s the modernism of the previous era that began to metastasize at the Council and only now is becoming incarnate with and within Pope Francis. Is he merely only following to the letter the dictates of the Council Fathers that laid down the new religion of syncretism, masonic philosophy, and progressive modernism. Perhaps our Pope is not deviant at all but very loyal….to the Council.

“Points of Rupture” of the Second Vatican Council with the Tradition of the Church – A Synopsis – On OnePeterFive

https://onepeterfive.com/the-points-of-rupture-of-the-second-vatican-council-with-the-tradition-of-the-church-a-synopsis/

Malaysian bishop joins ‘Pastoral Appeal’ on Communion and moral teaching | CatholicHerald.co.uk

http://www.catholicherald.co.uk/news/2018/05/16/malaysian-bishop-joins-pastoral-appeal-on-communion-and-moral-teaching/

Bishop Voderholzer: Intercommunion Proposal Requires Unanimity of Universal Church

http://www.ncregister.com/blog/edward-pentin/bishop-voderholzer-intercommunion-proposal-requires-more-than-german-unanim

Cardinal Müller Frets: The Church “Will Be Destroyed” if The Bishops Don’t Act – May 13th On Fatima Perspective –

http://fatima.org/news-views/fatima-perspective-1199/

Intercommunion and the German bishops: this is what a ‘synodal’ Church looks like | CatholicHerald.co.uk

Protestantizing The Church Continues

http://www.catholicherald.co.uk/commentandblogs/2018/05/04/intercommunion-and-the-german-bishops-this-is-what-a-synodal-church-looks-like/

Neocon George Weigel: German Bishops Not Catholic Anymore– On gloria.tv

https://gloria.tv/article/6xWxmamokiCY3PMjdbDtyrhyu

Protestant Death – Presbyterian Minister Blesses Planned Parenthood Abortion Clinic in God’s Name, Volunteers as Chaplain | LifeNews.com

http://www.lifenews.com/2018/05/11/presbyterian-minister-blesses-planned-parenthood-abortion-clinic-in-gods-name-volunteers-as-its-chaplain/

Pope Francis Luther Turning Point – De Mattei

https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/?m=1

Msgr Livi on Pope Francis, His Promoting of Heretics and of a Lutheran Reform – OnePeterFive

https://onepeterfive.com/msgr-livi-on-pope-francis-his-promoting-of-heretics-and-of-a-lutheran-reform/

Pope Francis: A Pelagian Lutheran -On The Remnant Newspaper –

https://remnantnewspaper.com/web/index.php/articles/item/3857-pope-francis-a
-pelagian-lutheran

Protestants – When the “Reformers” Abandoned the Eucharist – By Father J Schall – On Crisis Magazine

http://www.crisismagazine.com/2017/on-the-reformation

What the eternal magisterium teaches about Roman Catholicism as opposed to protestantism is as follows :

From Leo X’s Famous Encyclical Exsurge Domine –  Let all of this Holy Roman Catholic Church unite in anathemas and condemnations of the heresies of martin luther

Exsurge Domine – On Papal Encyclicals

http://www.papalencyclicals.net/leo10/l10exdom.htm

Cardinal Burke: Catholics must let Christ reign as King in face of ‘apostasy’ within Church | News | LifeSite

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/cardinal-burke-catholics-must-allow-christ-to-reign-as-king-in-face-of-apos

_________________________________________

 Notes on the Concept of Christendom – Nobility and Analogous Traditional Elites

http://www.nobility.org/2018/05/17/notes-on-the-concept-of-christendom/

___________________________________

The second letter of the apostle John Whoever is faithful to the teaching of Christ possesses both the Father and the Son

The elder to a Lady who is elect and to her children.

In truth I love each of you—and not only I but also all those who have come to know the truth. This love is based on the truth that abides in us and will be with us forever. In truth and love, then, we shall have grace, mercy, and peace from God the Father and from Jesus Christ, the Father’s Son.

It has given me great joy to find some of your children walking in the path of truth, just as we were commanded by the Father. But now, my Lady, I would make this request of you (not as if I were writing you some new commandment; rather, it is a commandment we have had from the start): let us love one another. This love involves our walking according to the commandments, and as you have heard from the beginning, the commandment is the way in which you should walk.

Many deceitful men have gone out into the world, men who do not acknowledge Jesus Christ as coming in the flesh. Such is the deceitful one! This is the antichrist! Look out that you yourselves do not lose what you have worked for; you must receive your reward in full.

Anyone who is so “progressive” that he does not remain rooted in the teaching of Christ does not possess God, while anyone who remains rooted in the teaching possesses both the Father and the Son. If anyone comes to you who does not bring this teaching, do not receive him into your house; do not even greet him, for whoever greets him shares in the evil he does.

While there is much more that I could write you, I do not intend to put it down on paper; instead, I hope to visit you and talk with you face to face, so that our joy may be full.

The children of your elect sister send you their greetings.

From the treatise On the Trinity by Saint Hilary, bishop
The Father’s gift in Christ

Our Lord commanded us to baptize in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit. In baptism, then, we profess faith in the Creator, in the only-begotten Son and in the gift which is the Spirit. There is one Creator of all things, for in God there is one Father from whom all things have their being. And there is one only-begotten Son, our Lord Jesus Christ, through whom all things exist. And there is one Spirit, the gift who is in all. So all follow their due order, according to the proper operation of each: one power, which brings all things into being, one Son, through whom all things come to be, and one gift of perfect hope. Nothing is wanting to this flawless union: in Father, Son and Holy Spirit, there is infinity of endless being, perfect reflection of the divine image, and mutual enjoyment of the gift.

Our Lord has described the purpose of the Spirit’s presence in us. Let us listen to his words: I have yet many things to say to you, but you cannot bear them now. It is to your advantage that I go away; if I go, I will send you the Advocate. And also: I will ask the Father and he will give you another Counselor to be with you for ever, the Spirit of truth. He will guide you into all the truth; for he will not speak on his own authority, but whatever he hears he will speak, and he will declare to you the things that are to come. He will glorify me, for he will take what is mine.

From among many of our Lord’s sayings, these have been chosen to guide our understanding, for they reveal to us the intention of the giver, the nature of the gift and the condition for its reception. Since our weak minds cannot comprehend the Father or the Son, we have been given the Holy Spirit as our intermediary and advocate, to shed light on that hard doctrine of our faith, the incarnation of God.

We receive the Spirit of truth so that we can know the things of God. In order to grasp this, consider how useless the faculties of the human body would become if they were denied their exercise. Our eyes cannot fulfill their task without light, either natural or artificial; our ears cannot react without sound vibrations, and in the absence of any odor our nostrils are ignorant of their function. Not that these senses would lose their own nature if they were not used; rather, they demand objects of experience in order to function. It is the same with the human soul. Unless it absorbs the gift of the Spirit through faith, the mind has the ability to know God but lacks the light necessary for that knowledge.

This unique gift which is in Christ is offered in its fullness to everyone. It is everywhere available, but it is given to each man in proportion to his readiness to receive it. Its presence is the fuller, the greater a man’s desire to be worthy of it. This gift will remain with us until the end of the world, and will be our comfort in the time of waiting. By the favors it bestows, it is the pledge of our hope for the future, the light of our minds, and the splendor that irradiates our understanding.

 

Subscribe

  • Entries (RSS)
  • Comments (RSS)

Archives

  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015

Categories

  • @Uncategorized
  • Abortion, Infanticide and Contraception
  • Blessed Virgin Mary and her Titles
  • Books and Other Resources
  • Divorce and Annulment
  • Education
  • Euthanasia
  • Events of Traditional Catholics
  • General-Traditional Catholics
  • Homesexuality and Transgenderism
  • Islam
  • Jehova's Witness
  • Liturgy
  • Music, sacred
  • News-Catholic Church, Vatican and Clergy
  • Nobility
  • Politics
  • Protestanism
  • Religions (Other)
  • Sacraments
  • Saints
  • Social Media and Internet
  • Tradition and Culture
  • Traditional Family
  • Vaccinations and Health

Meta

  • Log in

Proudly powered by WordPress Theme: Chateau by Ignacio Ricci.