Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

This news round up contains five sections traditional Catholic news, prolife news , transgender revolution movement news, vaccine news , and the great reset news , followed by the Saints of the day. 

Traditional Roman Catholic News Section

ProLife News Section

Transsexual Revolution Movement News

 Vaccine News Section

Great Reset Section

Saints Of The Day

From The Most Recent News Round Up


Photopost – All Saints Day 2025 and First Holy Communion At The Pontifical Shrine of OL of Mt Carmel NYC |TCE

A Biblical Defense Of Our Queen

A large part of ** a traditional Catholic’s mission is being an advocate of traditional biblical/Catholic/ Christian beliefs in the modern world and modernist Roman church…It is to show, from as many angles as possible, that the sinister drivel flowing from the Vatican is not the real Catholic Faith.

It is not even a slight deviation, or a watered-down version, nor is it the aggiornamento —(updating) that the wicked architects of the Second Vatican Council wanted us to believe. No, dear Catholic faithful, this is an altogether different beast. Actually, Beast-with a capital 

B— as in Beast System, or something else that shares those initials.

But a different religion, nonetheless.

If we were merely some lunatic raving day after day about the superiority of Rugby over football or whether one political party say Republican is better than another say a democratic ideal, 

I could understand if people relegated my comments/writings to the permanently deleted bin. 

They would be justified.

But that is not the case. If you believe extra ecclesiam nulla salus (there is no salvation outside the Church) and that the Catholic Church is the Church Christ promised in Matthew 16 and founded upon the Cross, then logic dictates that, for the sake of your eternal soul, you had better make sure not only that you find yourself in the Catholic Church, but also that the Church teaches what has been handed down through all the ages—at least up to 1962.

Exhibit A

Superstition” vs. Scripture: Does Mary Hold Back God’s Wrath?

The most revealing line in the whole Mater Populi Fidelis rollout wasn’t in the text but in the commentary. Father Maurizio Gronchi, one of the DDF’s experts, said it is “superstition” to think the Virgin Mary “has the role of holding back God’s wrath,” and that whoever thinks this way “is not in accordance with the Gospel.” Suddenly it’s not just Co-Redemptrix and Mediatrix on the chopping block; it’s the entire idea that Our Lady’s intercession can avert chastisement.

But the logic he condemns is simply the biblical logic of intercession. Abraham bargains for Sodom; Moses stands in the breach for Israel; God “relents” from punishments in response to the prayers of His friends. Not because He changes His eternal will, but because He freely wills to tie certain graces to their prayers. That is what it means when we say the saints “appease” or “avert” God’s wrath: divine justice is real, and so is the fact that God has chosen to factor their petitions into His providence.

If that is true of ordinary saints, it is strange to suddenly declare it dangerous when applied in a unique way to the Woman at the foot of the Cross. The entire Marian tradition, from the Fathers through the great Doctors, assumes that her intercession has real weight in the order of grace. Popes have called her Reparatrix, “suppliant omnipotence,” treasurer of graces, and Mother to whom we fly precisely in times when chastisement threatens. Fatima’s basic structure is nothing else: a world hanging under judgment, and a Mother whose requests for prayer and penance obtain delays and mitigations.

The trick in Gronchi’s line is a caricature of God. No Catholic who knows their catechism imagines Mary “talking down” an irritable Father. Classical theology has always been clear: God does not change; “wrath” is analogical for the effect of divine justice on obstinate sinners. To say that Mary’s intercession “holds back” wrath means that God has eternally willed to grant certain graces, conversion instead of hardening, protection instead of punishment, because she asks for them. Deny that, and you don’t just flatten Marian piety; you gut the entire doctrine of the Communion of Saints.

So when a Vatican official tells the faithful that seeing Mary as a real shield against judgment is “not in accordance with the Gospel,” he isn’t just trimming excesses. He is sawing off a branch Scripture, the Fathers, the popes, and the great apparitions have all been sitting on for centuries.

The revolution doesn’t just want a smaller Mariology. It wants a safer, softer God; one whose justice never really threatens, and whose Mother no longer needs to stand in anyone’s way